Allowed

Sunil a.v.& Another v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC21 Oct 2011Bail Appl./7470/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for anticipatory bail, the single judge of the Kerala High Court granted bail to the petitioners charged with offences under Section 498A IPC. Specific conditions for reporting and conduct were imposed.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to conditions of reporting, interrogation, no tampering with evidence or offences, on executing bond with sureties.

Sunil a.v.& Another Vs State of Kerala — Matrimonial and Divorce | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2011 / 29TH ASWINA 1933

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 7470 of 2011

¶6

CRIME NO.814 OF 2011 OF GANDHINAGER POLICE STATION

¶7

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED-A1-A2

¶8

¶9

SUNIL A.V., AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.VASU, KALAPARAKKAL VEEDU, MAREYATH MURI, CHUGAM, PERUBAIKKADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

¶10

AMMINI, AGED 65 YEARS, W/O.VASU, KALAPARAKKAL VEEDU, MAREYATH MURI, CHUGAM, PERUBAIKKADU VILLAGE,

¶11

KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

¶12

BY ADV. SRI.AJITH MURALI

¶13

RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT

¶14

¶15

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶16

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.T.K.RANJITH

¶17

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

K.T.SANKARAN, J.

¶19

-----------------------------------------------------Bail Appl. NO. 7470 OF 2011

¶20

Dated this the 21^st day of October, 2011

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.814 of 2011 of Gandhinagar Police Station, Kottayam District.

¶23

The offence alleged against the petitioners is under Section 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶24

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶25

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners. There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station shall release

¶26

BAIL APPL. NO. 7470 OF 2011

¶27

:: 2 ::

¶28

them on bail on their executing bond for Rupees Ten thousand each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶29

a) The first petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on alternate Sundays, till the final report is filed or until further orders;

¶30

b) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required;

¶31

c) The petitioners shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

¶32

d) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail;

¶33

e) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶34

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

¶35

above.

¶36

(K.T.SANKARAN) Judge

¶37

ahz/

Sunil a.v.& Another v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil a.v.& Another v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod P.George Vs State of Kerala

Sanal Kumar Vs S.I.of Police, Pothenkodu Police Station

Biju @ Vijesh Vs State of Kerala

Sanajayan Vs State

Santhosh & Others Vs State

Rejula Vs the State of Kerala