Vinod P.George v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed a bail application as infructuous without recording any substantive reasons or engaging with specific legal propositions.
The Kerala High Court dismissed a bail application as infructuous without recording any substantive reasons or engaging with specific legal propositions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2011 / 28TH ASWINA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 5456 of 2011() ------------------------CRIME NO.310/2011 OF KANJAR POLICE STATION IDUKKI DISTRICT
PETITIONERS:ACCUSED :
RESPONDENTS:
Bail Appl..No. 5456 of 2011
Additional R4 : ANOOP.P.GEORGE, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.VARKEY, PARAPARAKATTU HOUSE, NOW RESIDING AT C/O.CELIN, PULLIKKATTIL HOUSE, PANNIMATTOM.P.O.THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
Additional R5: GINCY ANOOP, AGED 29 YEARS, W/O.ANOOP, RESIDING AT C/O.CELIN, PULLIKKATTIL HOUSE, PANNIMATTOM.P.O.THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
(Additional R4 and R5 impleaded as per the order dated 8.8.2011 in Crl.M.Appln.No.4999 of 2011 in B.A.5456 of 2011.)
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.T.K.RENJITH
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
Bail Appln.No.5456 of 2011
Dated this the 20th day of October, 2011
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the Bail Application has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Bail Application is dismissed as infructuous.
K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE
skj
Vinod. P. George
Varkey @ Joy
Tressiamma
State of Kerala
K.T.Sankaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court