Saraswathy and Others v. State of Kerala and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
On an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC, the Court observed that since no crime was registered against the petitioners and the police had no intention to arrest them, the application was closed with liberty to approach the Court again if occasion arises.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to petitioners to approach the Court again as and when occasion arises.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2011 / 19TH SRAVANA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 5877 of 2011() -------------------------
PETITIONERS :
- SARASWATHY, W/O.RAJAPPAN, AGED 58 YEARS, KADAYIL VEEDU, CHIRAMOOLA BHAGAM, KADAKKAVOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
- AJITHA KUMARI, D/O.RAJAPPAN, AGED 33 YEARS, KADAYIL VEEDU, CHIRAMOOLA, KADAKKAVOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
- RAJU, S/O.RAJAPPAN, AGED 37 YEARS, KADAYIL VEEDU, CHIRAMOOLA, KADAKKAVOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
- SUDHAKUMARI, W/O.SHAJI, AGED 41 YEARS, S.A.LAND, VANKADAVU, MANAMPOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.TRIPTEN
RESPONDENTS: STATE & COMPLAINANT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for anticipatory bail should be disposed of when no crime is registered against the petitioners?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SARASWATHY
- petitioner
AJITHA KUMARI
- petitioner
RAJU
- petitioner
SUDHAKUMARI
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court