The Kerala High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail filed by four accused persons. The court refused the plea due to the gravity of offences and the injury sustained, noting that granting bail would hinder the investigation.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed; no bail granted to the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 9TH AUGUST 2011 / 18TH SRAVANA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 5515 of 2011() ----------------------------(CRIME NO.508 OF 2011 OF KOYILANDY POLICE, KOZHIKODE) PETITIONERS -------------------------------
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------
STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,REP.THE S.I. OF POLICE,KOYILANDY POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE.
BY PP MR.V. TEKCHAND
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J .
--------------------------------B.A.No.5515 OF 2011
--------------------------------Dated this the 9th day of August, 2011
ORDER
This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Petitioners are accused Nos.1, 2, 4 and 3 in Crime No.508 of 2011 of the Koyilandy Police Station, Kozhikode District.
B.A.No.5515 OF 2011
2
submitted that at present, he has no instruction in the matter.
For the aforesaid reason, the Bail Application is dismissed.
K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE .
cms
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners accused of assault and unlawful assembly offences.
Whether the gravity of the offence and the injury sustained would adversely affect the investigation.
Whether the bail application should be allowed or dismissed given the facts of the case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anuraj
Babithlal
Sumesh
Naseer
State of Kerala
K.T. Sankaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
