Allowed

Shameer v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC25 Feb 2011Bail Appl./1158/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the petitioner/accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 511 and 380 I.P.C., directing him to execute a bond and adhere to specific conditions regarding reporting and witness protection.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was released on bail upon executing a bond for Rs. 15,000/- with two solvent sureties and complying with conditions to report to the IO, be available for interrogation, not tamper with

Shameer Vs State of Kerala — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1932

¶3

Bail Appl..No. 1158 of 2011() ----------------------------CRIME NO.133/2011 OF MATTANCHERY POLICE STATION

¶4

PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶5

-------------------------------------SHAMEER, S/O. SHAMSU, AGED 23 YEARS, CC XXVI/559, RAMESWARAM COLONY, RAMESWARAM, KOCHI.

¶6

BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV

¶7

RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT

¶8

-------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM(CRIME NO.133/2011 OF MATTANCHERY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT)

¶9

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ

¶10

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶11

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

¶12

Bail Application No.1158 of 2011

¶13

----------------------------------------------------Dated this the 25^th day of February, 2011

¶14

ORDER

¶15

In this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.133 of 2011 of Mattanchery Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 511 of 380 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 25/01/2011.

¶16

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶17

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, the present stage of investigation of the case and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for `15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned and subject to the following conditions:-

¶18

1. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶19

Bail Appln.No.1158/2011

¶20

: 2 :

¶21

2. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police at any time till the filing of the final report.

¶22

3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶23

4. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶24

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶25

This application is allowed as above.

¶26

Dated this the 25^th day of February, 2011.

¶27

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶28

skj

Shameer v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shameer v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Reghu Vs State of Kerala

Thomas.G. Vs State of Kerala

Yousaf Vs Excise Range Officer

K.Suresh Kumar Vs State of Kerala

Sureshkumar Vs State of Kerala

Rajesh Vs State of Kerala