Thomas.G. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala refused anticipatory bail in a rape case, directing the accused to surrender for police interrogation before applying for regular bail.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to surrender for interrogation; anticipatory bail denied.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 671 of 2011(B) ---------------------------------------[CRIME NO.59/2011 OF NEDUMKANDAM POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT] .............
PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ----------------------------------
THOMAS.G., S/O.GEORGE, PUTHANVEEDU, MATTUKETTAKARA, AYYAPPANKOVIL VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI.
BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV.
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM (CRIME NO.59/2010 OF NEDUMKANDAM POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT).
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case under Section 376 IPC before the petitioner is interrogated by the police.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THOMAS.G.
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court