K.Aboobacker v. Rta Palakkad and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought consideration of a modified permit proposal (Ext.P4) alongside a renewal application. The court directed the RTA to consider the proposal expeditiously within two months.
What did the court decide?
Directing the first respondent to consider the modified proposal in Ext.P4 while deciding the regular permit application within two months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
THURSDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2010 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1932
WP(C).No. 9457 of 2010(F)
-----------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
K.ABOOBACKER, KODALIPULIKKOTTIL HOUSE, PULPATTA, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM.
BY ADV. MR.I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Aboobacker
- respondent
The Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad
Coram
K. Surendra Mohan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court