petitioner is doing distribution work, and not doing any loading and unloading work and, therefore, the petitioner cannot be obstructed by the fourth respondent, is a plea which can be accepted. The salesmen accompanying the covered vehicle may be having the documents relating to the goods with them. It may even have to tally them with reference to the particular shop they are to be delivered. There is no case however that the goods are being unloaded by using mechanical device. This means necessarily that the goods will have to be carried from the van to the shop. The vehicle could be parked near the shop or far away from the shop. As long as the activity of the salesmen attracts the definition of the word “headload worker” in the Headload Workers Act, we fail to see how it is open to the petitioner to contend that the petitioner can carry on the loading and unloading work through the alleged salesmen, flouting the requirement of the law, in an area covered by the Scheme. It is pertinent to notice that the definition of the word “headload worker” includes a person carrying goods on his head or about
