The Kerala High Court held the writ petition closed as infructuous based on the respondent's submission that no further orders were necessary, rendering the petition a non-starter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2010 / 25TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 25175 of 2010(V) -------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
BY ADV. SRI.K.C.ELDHO.
RESPONDENT(S):
WPC 25175 OF 2010
-2-
R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS.
ADV. SRI.JAIBY PAUL FOR R8-9
SRI.JAYAN V.EAPEN FOR R8-9.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
W.P.(C) No.25175 of 2010-V
Dated, this the 16th day of August, 2010
J U D G M E N T
K.M.Joseph, J.
It is submitted that no further orders are
necessary in this writ petition. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is closed as infructuous.
(K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE.
(M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS)
JUDGE.
MS
Martin
P.K.Ajith Kumar
Abdul Sathar
Jose Bennete
State of Kerala
Supdt. of Police, Alleppey
K.M.Joseph
M.L.Joseph Francis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
