Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move afresh. Court granted permission and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to move afresh was granted; Writ Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2010 / 25TH JYAISTHA 1932
WP(C).No. 16718 of 2010(L)
PETITIONER(S):
LINTU P.PANAKKAL, KUTHOOR HOUSE, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.DEEPU THANKAN
RESPONDENT(S):
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.DILIP MOHAN-R2
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
W.P.(C). NO.16718 OF 2010
Dated this the 15th day of June, 2010
JUDGMENT
When the matter came up for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to move afresh. Permission sought for is granted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE)
spc
W.P.(C) NO.16718/2010
2
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
W.P.(C). NO.16718/2010
JUDGMENT
15th June, 2010
LINTU P.PANAKKAL
THE MANAGER, M.J.D.HIGH SCHOOL, KUNNAMKULAM
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD
C.T. Ravikumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
