Allowed

Dhakshayani v. Vs the State of Kerala

Kerala HC26 Jul 2010WP(C)/1604/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge of the Kerala High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by a retired teacher seeking protection for life and property. Directing respondents 1 to 3, the court ordered them to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner against respondents 4 to 6.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 1 to 3 are directed to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's life against respondents 4 to 6.

Dhakshayani v Vs the State of Kerala — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS

¶4

MONDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2010 / 4TH SRAVANA 1932

¶5

WP(C).No. 1604 of 2010(A)

PETITIONER(S):

DHAKSHAYANI V., VARNAM, POOKKODU P.O., PATHAYAKKUNNU VIA, THALASSERY.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR SMT.NIKHILA SOMAN

¶11

RESPONDENT(S):

¶12

¶13

THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANNUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOOTHUPARAMBA POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT.

¶15

THE S.I. OF POLCIE, KATHIRUR POLCIE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT.

¶16

REENA P., ANJANAM, KACHERIMEDU, CHETOOR P.O., PALAKKAD.

¶17

K.C.RAJENDRAN, .P.T.TEACHER, GOVT. GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, CHETOOR P.O., PALAKKAD.

¶18

RAJITH P., VARNAM, POOKKODU P.O., KOOTHUPARAMBU, KANNUR DISTRICT.

¶19

R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS.

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

WPC NO.1604 OF 2010

¶22

APPENDIX:

¶23

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶24

EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 16.1.2007.

¶25

EXT.P2.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 22.12.2009.

¶26

K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.

¶27

¶28

W.P.(C) No.1604 of 2010-A

¶29

Dated, this the 26^th day of July, 2010

¶30

J U D G M E N T

¶31

K.M.Joseph, J.

¶32

Petitioner is a retired teacher. Petitioner has

¶33

approached this Court seeking protection for life and properties. A direction to the 3^rd respondent to take appropriate action on Ext.P2 is also sought. The 6^th respondent is the son of the petitioner, the 4^th respondent is her daughter and the 5^th respondent is her son-in-law. This Court has already passed an interim order.

¶34

Though served, there is no appearance for the party respondents. The writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to the life of the petitioner against respondents 4 to 6.

¶35

(K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE.

¶36

(M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE.

¶37

Dhakshayani v. Vs the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhakshayani v. Vs the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prasanna Kumar Vs Thiruvananthapuram Airport Taxi Drivers

Akhila Yousuf Vs State of Kerala

Geemon @ Antony Vs State of Kerala

Prabhakaran Vs Parameswaran

James Philip Vs the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs

Saleena Vs the Supdt of Police