High Court of Kerala interim order made absolute granting police protection to petitioners based on apprehension, without pronouncing on merits of underlying allegations.
Direction to respondents 3 to 5 to provide adequate police protection to petitioners; direction to 4th respondent to act on Ext.P7 petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
FRIDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2010 / 1ST SRAVANA 1932
WP(C).No. 19394 of 2010(Y) --------------------------
PETITIONERS:
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL
RESPONDENTS:
W/O.MUHAMMED ABDUL KHADER, RESIDING DO. PIN-680005.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI. T K VIPINDAS FOR 1 TO 5 SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU FOR R6-9 SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) FOR R6-9
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 19394 of 2010
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :
// TRUE COPY //
K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
JUDGMENT
Joseph, J.
The petitioners have approached this Court seeking a
direction to respondents 3 to 5 to provide adequate and
sufficient police protection to the lives and property of the petitioners and direct the 4th respondent to take action upon Ext.P7 petition filed before him and the 3rd respondent.
the learned Government Pleader.
W.P.(C).No. 19394 of 2010
made by the petitioners. Of course, learned counsel for the party respondents submits that the said respondents have filed complaints before the police.
dispose of the Writ Petition by making the interim order absolute. We, however, make it clear that when the matter involving the petitioners and the party respondents comes up before any forum/court, the said forum/court shall proceed to decide the matter untrammeled by anything contained in this judgment.
Judge
Judge
tm
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue direction to respondents 3 to 5 for providing adequate police protection to the petitioners.
Whether to direct the 4th respondent to take action upon petitions filed before him and the 3rd respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Akhila Yousuf
Youssuf
Thanuja Yousuf
State of Kerala
Director General of Police
Superintendent of Police
K.M. Joseph
M.L. Joseph Francis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
