Mr.Mijulal Vs the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), Ekm.

Challenging Ext.P1 penalty order dated 09.02.2010, the petitioner has preferred Ext. P3 appeal along with Ext. P4 petition for stay and Ext. P5 petition for early hearing of the appeal. The grievance of the petitioner is that it is without any regard to the pendency of the above proceedings Ext.P6 demand notice has been issued by the third respondent.

¶23

Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

¶24

Considering the facts and circumstances, the first respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 petition for stay, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. It is made clear that till such orders are passed on Ext.P4 petition for stay, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P6 shall be kept in abeyance.

¶25

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶26

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

¶27

lk

Mr.Mijulal v. the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), Ekm.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.Mijulal v. the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), Ekm.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cannanore Roller Flour Mills Pvt.Ltd. Vs the Kerala Financial Corporation & Ors.

Mohamedkunhi Vs the Canara Bank

B.Suriakumar Vs the General Manager and Others

K.P.P.Fathima Vs the Kerala State Housing Board

Jimmy Joseph Vs Dtc Kozhikode

Sri.M.K.Ummer Vs the Intelligence Officer (Ib) and Others