Govt of India v. P.C.Paul
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Kerala held that the respondent is not entitled to pension without requisite qualifying service per Supreme Court law. Allowed appeal, dismissed original petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ Appeal allowed; Original Petition dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
MONDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2010 / 19TH ASWINA 1932
WA.No. 698 of 2005(E)
---------------------
( AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.3.2004 IN O.P. 32760 OF 2000 )
APPELLANTS: RESPONDENTS:
- GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI.
- DIRECTOR GENERAL, BORDER SECUTIRY FORCE PAY & ACCOUNTS DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, PUSHPA BHAVAN, MADANGIR, NEW DELHI-110 062.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent is entitled to get pension under the BSF Rules without requisite qualifying service.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
- appellant
DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE PAY & ACCOUNTS DIVISION GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
- appellant
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
- appellant
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE
- respondent
P.C. PAUL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court