V.C.Bhaskaran v. R.S.Anu
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed the contemnor's affidavit regarding non-compliance with a writ order on terminal benefits, finding the matter disposed of as benefits were paid. The court closed the contempt case but preserved the petitioner's right to claim remaining dues.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; petitioner's right to claim remaining benefits preserved.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
FRIDAY, THE 8TH OCTOBER 2010 / 16TH ASWINA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 454 of 2010(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.14365/2009 Dated 02/06/2009
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
V.C.BHASKARAN.,S/O.CHATHAN.,
AGED 61 YEARS,RETIRED NMR WORKER, CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY,RESIDING AT VEESUPALAUZHATHIL,KEEZHCERIMEL, PULIKKUNNU, CHENGANNUR
BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
SMT.R.S.ANU,AGED AT ABOUT 52 YEARS, WIFE OF (NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), WORKING AS SECRETARY, CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY, CHENGANNUR.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.C. Bhaskaran
- respondent
Smt. R.S. Anu
Coram
J. Chelameswar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court