Review petition filed seeking to recall a judgment dated 6.8.2010 due to absence of counsel. Court allowed the review on lenient terms and set the pre-writ petition for further hearing.
Review petition allowed; judgment dated 6.8.2010 recalled. Matter posted post the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
TUESDAY, THE 5TH OCTOBER 2010 / 13TH ASWINA 1932
RP.No. 830 of 2010() -------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.13860/2007 ....................
REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS IN WP
BY ADV. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT IN WP
GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.ANTONY MUKKATH
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
R.P.No. 830/2010 in W.P.(C).No. 13860/2007
==================
Dated this the 5th day of October, 2010 O R D E R
The petitioners in this review petition seek review of my judgment dated 6.8.2010 in W.P.(C).No.13860/2007. One of the grounds urged is that on the date of hearing, the counsel for the petitioners could not be present and, therefore, the counsel could not place arguments of the petitioners on record. Taking a lenient view, I allow the review petition and recall my judgment dated 6.8.2010.
Post the writ petition along with S.A.No.748/1998.
sdk+
Sd/S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
BINAY JOSEPH, AJITH C.NAIR, RAJI SHAJU
STATE OF KERALA, SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SURVEY, ANTONY, REV. FATHER PAUL CHULLY
S.SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
