C.Chandran v. Sanjay Koul
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner reported that compliance with the direction in the impugned order had been made. Court closed the contempt case on the basis of this submission.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
TUESDAY, THE 5TH OCTOBER 2010 / 13TH ASWINA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 1145 of 2010(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.21181/2010 Dated 08/07/2010
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN W.P(C)
CHANDRAN.C., KADAYAR PUTHEN VEEDU, MYLOTHUMUZHI, VEERANAKAVU.P.O., KATTAKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT -------------------------
SANJAY KOUL, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.ANTONY MUKKATH
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chandan C.
- respondent
Sanjay Koul
- respondent
District Collector, Thiruvananthapuram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court