Review petitions were allowed and underlying writ petition judgments were recalled as they were disposed of without considering prior interim orders passed in similar pending cases.
The Review Petitions are allowed and the judgments are recalled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2010 / 10TH ASHADHA 1932
RP.No. 549 of 2010(M)
--------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16326/2010
REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
/2/
BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ARAVINDKUMAR BABU SC FOR PSC SRI. ALEXANDER THOMAS
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/07/2010 A/W. WP(c).No.565/2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
---------------------------------------------------------------
R.P.Nos.549/2010 in WP(c).NO.16326/2010 &
565/2010 in WP(c) NO.15771/2010
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 1st day of July, 2010
O R D E R
The writ petitions were disposed of without taking note of the fact that in similar writ petitions Annexure-A1 interim orders
have been passed and those cases are pending. For that reason
the Review Petitions are allowed and the judgments are recalled.
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
vi/
K.V.BALAKRISHNAN and others
STATE OF KERALA and others
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
