Joby K.Kuriakose v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2010 / 15TH ASHADHA 1932
OP.No. 20830 of 2002(D)
------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
1. JOBY K.KURIAKOSE, KAKKAMVEETTIL VEEDU, VADAYAMPADY P.O., PUTHENCRUZ.
2. SAJITH T.B., THOZHUTHUNGAL HOUSE, AMBALLOOR P.O., AMBALLOOR 682 315.
3. RAJU K.T., THELAKKATUKURUVIL HOUSE, KUZHIYARA P.O., CHOTTANIKKARA.
BY ADV. SRI.JOJI VARGHESE
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------
1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR OF TRAINING, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, SHARAM SHAKTI BHAVAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI.
2. DIRECTOR OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE PRINCIPAL, INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, KALAMASSERY.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.HARIDAS, ADDL.CGSC SMT.S.AMBIKA DEVI, ADDL.CGSC R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.RAMESH
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Kss
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
O.P.No.20830 of 2002
==================
Dated this the 6th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T
The petitioners and the counsel are absent. Dismissed for
default.
Sd/-
sdk+
S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
O.P.No.20830 of 2002-D
==================
J U D G M E N T
6th July, 2010
JOBY K.KURIAKOSE
SAJITH T.B.
RAJU K.T.
UNION OF INDIA
DIRECTOR OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
THE PRINCIPAL, INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, KALAMASSERY
S.SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court