Meenakshi Amma v. Sree Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case, the petitioner claimed the first respondent had disbursed the amount due. Standing counsel stated the second respondent sanctioned Rs. 2.69 lakhs for payment within two days. The court recorded this.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2010 / 30TH ASHADHA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 853 of 2010(S)
-----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.34415/2003 Dated 06/04/2004
PETITIONER(S): / PETITIONER
MEENAKSHI AMMA, AGED 82 YEARS, W/O.LATE GOVINDAN NAIR, THENALI HOUSE, KANDIYOOR, MAVELIKKARA.
BY ADV. SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ
RESPONDENT(S): / RESPONDENTS
- SREE KUMAR, AGE AND S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEFENCE PENSION DISBURSING OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DEFENCE PENSION DISBURSING OFFICER, KOTTAYAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MEENAKSHI AMMA
- respondent
SREE KUMAR
- respondent
SANTHOSH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court