M.S.Purushan v. Raveendran
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case closed noting Government Pleader's submission that disciplinary proceedings were finalised and report sent with proposal to reduce petitioner's pension.
What did the court decide?
contempt of court case closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2010 / 25TH ASHADHA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 845 of 2010(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.14962/2008 Dated 23/12/2009 ....................
PETITIONER(S): / PETITIONER
M.S.PURUSHAN,AGED 58, S/O.LATE SHANMUGHAN, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS(RETIRED) COLLECTORATE, ERANKULAM QURTER NO.B.20/78,H.N.L.,NEWSPRINT NAGER P.O., KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI
RESPONDENT(S): / 3RD RESPONDENT ---------------
RAVEENDRAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS DIRECTOR OF SURVERY & LAND RECORDS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-01.
MR.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.S. Purushan
- other
Government Pleader
Coram
Antony Dominic
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court