Closed a contempt of court petition against a preliminary order dated 21/04/2009. The petitioner and respondent produced an order as directed, and the court closed the case, leaving any grievances to be addressed in separate proceedings.
The petitioner is permitted to seek grievance against the order in appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2010 / 25TH ASHADHA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 770 of 2010(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.12211/2009 Dated 21/04/2009 ....................
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER
THRESIA KURIAN, AGED 79 YERS, W/O.KURIAN PERUMBRAL HOUSE, NEDIYASALA KARA AND POST, PURAPUZHA VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.IYPE JOSEPH SRI.V.MANOJ KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S): /3rd RESPONDENT
M.N.VIJAYAN, AGED 50 YEARS,FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY, PURAPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH VAZHITHALA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT.
ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI SRI.A.S.SAJUSH PAUL SRI.THOMAS JAMES MUNDACKAL SRI.BOBBY THOMAS
MR.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
COC No.770 of 2010
Dated, this the 16th day of July, 2010
J U D G M E N T
Though belatedly, by Annexure-I order dated 12/07/2010 produced along with the affidavit of the respondent, order has been passed as directed in the judgment.
In view of this, the contempt of court case is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to seek her grievances against the order, if she is aggrieved.
(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg
THRESIA KURIAN
NAMED THIRD RESPONDENT
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
