I.v.Ratnappan v. v.S.Baby
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition alleging violation of an undertaking to stop a unit. Court noted dispute on facts, stated petitioner could file fresh writ, closed the contempt case leaving facts open.
What did the court decide?
CC closed; remedy of filing fresh writ left open.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2010 / 23RD ASHADHA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 785 of 2010(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.9204/2010 ....................
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC
I.V.RATNAPPAN, AGED 75 YEARS, S/O.IYER, VELLAPPALLY HOUSE, KALAVAMKODAM P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN
RESPONDENT(S): 5TH RESPONDENT IN WPC
V.S.BABY, S/O.SANKARANKUNJU, NAMAKKAD HOUSE, VELLAPPALLY HOUSE, KALAVAMKODAM P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent violated the undertaking given to the court to stop the functioning of the unit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
I.V.RATNAPPAN
- respondent
V.S.BABY
Coram
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court