Ali v. Vikram and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner in a Civil Contempt Case argued that a prior court direction had been complied with. The court dismissed the case as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt Case is dismissed as not-pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2010 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1932
Con.Case(C).No. 71 of 2010(S) ----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.1638/2009 Dated 27/01/2009 ....................
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
ALI, S/O.MAKKAR, AGED 48 YEARS, THEKKEKADAVATH HOUSE, CHEMBARATHIKUNNU, VENGOLA, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
- VIKRAM, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALUVA (RURAL), ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
- G.D.VIJAYAKUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ali, S/O Makkar
- respondent
Vikram
- respondent
G. D. Vijayakumar
- respondent
Jayakumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court