C.K.Karunakaran v. Gopalakrishna Pillai
Case brief
What is this about?
The court held that the contempt case was closed as the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directions had been complied with.
The court held that the contempt case was closed as the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directions had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2010 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1339 of 2010(S)
---------------------------------------------[THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.37624/2008 DTD. 11/08/2010] ....................
PETITIONER:
-------------------
C.K.KARUNAKARAN S/O.KOCHU PILLAI, AGED 89 KALAPPURAKKAL, MUHAMMA P.O.,CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH.
RESPONDENT:
----------------------
GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, WORKING AS SECRETARY, FREEDOM FIGHTER'S DIVISION, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS,PIN-110 003.
BY ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDIA.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
prv.
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Con. Case (C) No. 1339 of 2010
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2010
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the
directions in Annexure-A judgment has been complied with. Accordingly the contempt case is closed.
Sd/S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE
//True copy//
P.A. TO JUDGE
shg/
C.K.KARUNAKARAN
GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI
S.SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court