Disposed

Ganesh v. S.I Marayur Police Station

Kerala HC15 Nov 2010Bail Appl./6821/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application by accused persons facing charges relating to grievous hurt and criminal trespass, the Court declined anticipatory bail but directed the petitioners to surrender for interrogation before regular bail could be considered.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail declined; petitioners directed to surrender for interrogation before regular bail consideration.

Ganesh Vs S.I Marayur Police Station — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1932

¶4

Bail Appl..No. 6821 of 2010()

¶5

--------------------------------------( CRIME NO. 287/2010 OFMARAYUR POLICE STATION,IDUKKI DIST ) ----------------

¶6

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3,4, & 5

¶7

--------------------------------------------------

¶8

1. GANESH, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O. PALANISWAMI RESIDING AT MAP III/1207, TOP DIVISION, CHATTA MUNNAR, THALAYAR ESTATE K.D.H. VILLAGE.

¶9

2. VILLARASAN, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O. MUTHAYYA, RESIDING AT MAP X/490,PULIKKARAVAIL CHEK POST, MARAYUR VILLAGE MUNNAR.

¶10

3. RAMU @ RAMAMURTHY, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. MUTHUSWAMI RESIDING AT MAP VI/193, MASHIVAYAL, MARAYUR VILLAGE, MUNNAR.

¶11

BY ADV. SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM

¶12

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT

¶13

------------------------------------------------

¶14

1. SUB INSPECTOR, MARAYUR POLICE STATION, MARAYUR, MUNNAR-685612.

¶15

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶16

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK

¶17

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

sts

¶19

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶20

B.A. No. 6821 of 2010

¶21

Dated this the 15^th day of November, 2010 ORDER

¶22

Petitioners, who are accused Nos.3, 4 and 5 in Crime No. 287 of 2010 of Marayur Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 308 and 427 r/w Section 34 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

¶23

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶24

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature.

¶25

But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 26.11.2010 or on 27.11.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioners have been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of their application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶26

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶27

Dated this the 15^th day of November, 2010.

¶28

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶29

Ganesh v. S.I Marayur Police Station

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh v. S.I Marayur Police Station

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Father Anto Chiramel Vs State of Kerala

Fr.James George Vs C.I.of Police

Jishi @ Undampori Jishy Vs State of Kerala

A.Muhammed Afsal Vs State of Kerala

Saly Vs State of Kerala

Johny Mathew Vs State of Kerala