Dismissed

Shiny v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC17 Sept 2010Bail Appl./5146/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application concerning offences under sections 406, 408, 465, and 420 of the IPC, the court denied anticipatory bail but directed the petitioner to surrender for interrogation before seeking regular bail from the Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail denied; petitioner directed to surrender for interrogation before filing regular bail application before the Magistrate.

Shiny Vs State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 26TH BHADRA 1932

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 5146 of 2010(E)

¶6

------------------------------------

¶7

(CRIME NUMBER NOT KNOWN. CHALAKKUDY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT)

¶8

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED

¶9

-----------------------------

¶10

SHINY, AGED 33 YEARS W/O.SAJEEVAN, KANNAKKASSARY HOUSE ALINJIPRA, CHOWKKA, CHALAKKUDY

¶11

BY ADVS. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN

¶12

RESPONDENT(S):

¶13

--------------------

¶14

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM

¶15

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZE

¶16

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

SVS/

¶18

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

¶19

Bail Application No.5146 of 2010

¶20

Dated this the 17^th day of September, 2010

¶21

ORDER

¶22

The petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.942/2010 of Chalakudy Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 406, 408, 465 & 420 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶23

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶24

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have her application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on 27/9/2010 or on 28/9/2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioner has been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of her application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶25

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶26

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶27

skj

Shiny v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiny v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naseem and Others Vs State of Kerala

Chandran and 3 Others Vs State of Kerala

Ganapathy Vs State of Kerala

Anand V.S. Vs Ci of Police, Ezhukone Police Station

C.Musthafa Vs State of Kerala

Binoj Varghese Vs State of Kerala