Vinod Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, an accused in a fraud and forgery case, noting his cooperation and the lack of objection from the public prosecutor, subject to surrender and investigation conditions.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted bail upon surrender within 7 days, posting a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties for the like amount.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA MONDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2010 / 31ST JYAISTHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 259 of 2010() ---------------------------(CRIME NO.12/2010 OF PEERUMEDU POLICE STATION , IDUKKI DISTRICT) PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 -------------------------------VINOD KUMAR, S/O. GOPI, AGED 31 YEARS, SHAJI BHAVAN, THENGAKKAL KARA, MANJUMALA VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.M.A.JOSEPH MANAVALAN SRI.P.A.MARTIN ROY
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT
-------------------------STATE OF KERALA THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMEDU POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V. TEK CHAND.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K. HEMA, J.
--------------------------------------------------B.A. No.259 of 2010
Dated this 21st day of June, 2010. ORDER
Petition for anticipatory bail.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the accused in a case alleging criminal conspiracy and forgery of a sale deed.
Whether the petitioner's delay in filing a complaint and the surrounding circumstances justify the grant of bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinod Kumar
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
K. Hema
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court