In an anticipatory bail application under the Arms Act, the court found no evidence to support the petitioner's claim of innocence or police malpractice. Consequently, the petitioner failed to establish exceptional circumstances, and the bail application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA
FRIDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2010 / 28TH JYAISTHA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 2281 of 2010()
----------------------------CRIME NO.90/2010 OF ARALAM POLICE STATION, KANNUR.
(S): PETITIONER/ACCUSED
T.G.SANTHOSH, S/O.JANARDHANAN,
THEKKINKATTIL HOUSE, AMBALAKANDI, ARALAM.P.O.
BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.TEK CHAND.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.HEMA, J.
---------------------------------------------Bail Application No.2281 of 2010
Dated 18th June, 2010.
O R D E R
This petition is for anticipatory bail.
Section 25(1B)(a) of the Arms Act. According to prosecution, on getting information, police conducted a search in the house of petitioner and a country gun was seized from the southern bed room of his house. It was found beneath the cot. A crime was registered against petitioner.
police and a false case is foisted against petitioner, it is submitted.
BA NO.2281/10
2
Petition is dismissed.
K.HEMA, JUDGE.
tgs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail given the lack of materials supporting the petitioner's alleged innocence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SANTHOSH
STATE
KHEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
