Sujith Joseph Philip v. the Secretary to Govt.
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that the petitioner cannot have a subsisting grievance as earlier directions invalidate the Commissioner's proceedings. The writ petition is closed, the initial allotment is validated, and other contentions are left open.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed with the observation that the initial allotment given to the petitioner shall continue to be valid.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1931
WP(C).No. 26310 of 2009(G) --------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
SUJITH JOSEPH HPHILIP, S/O. REJI JOSEPH, 'MULAMOOTIL' PATTOM EAST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.P.GOPAL
RESPONDENT(S):
- SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- THE COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS, HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has any subsisting grievance regarding the allotment given by the Commissioner for Entrance Examination.
Whether the proceedings drawn up by the Commissioner for Entrance Examinations can survive the directions issued by this Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sujith Joseph HPhilip
- respondent
Secretary to Government, Department of Higher Education
- respondent
The Commissioner of Entrance Examinations
- respondent
Nandita Krishna
- respondent
Rajeev.M.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court