Thajuniza v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged removal order based on conviction which was later quashed in Crl. Appeal. Court set aside removal order as it rested on the now-void conviction.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's writ petition is allowed; the order of removal (Ext.P2) is set aside and disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1931
WP(C).No. 17454 of 2009(B)
--------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
----------------------
THAJUNIZA, TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, DIRECTORATE OF AGRICULTURE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
RESIDING AT JEMI BHAVAN, KANIYAPURAN P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI
RESPONDENT(S):
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order removing the petitioner from service based on a conviction that was subsequently quashed deserves to be set aside.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thajuniza
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
Director of Agriculture, Thiruvananthapuram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court