Suneesh v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Abkari Act provisions regarding toddy ethyl alcohol content. Court held interim SC stay did not stay the Division Bench's law declaration.
What did the court decide?
Writ petitions dismissed as petitioners not entitled to reliefs sought.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2009 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1931
WP(C).No. 15109 of 2009(G)
PETITIONER(S):
- SUNEESH,S/O.JANARDHANAN,VALLYATH HOUSE, THEKKUMURI,PUTHUPPALLY VILLAGE,KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
- JAYAPRABHA,AGED 42 YEARS,S/O.SANKU, SANKARALAYAM HOUSE,KRISHNAPURAM.PO,KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
- MADANAN,S/O.KUNJU PANICKER,SIVA SADANAM, CHERAVALLY,KAYAMKULAM,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioners entitled to reliefs when Apex Court's interim stay does not interdict operation of rules declared unlawful by Division Bench.
Whether writ petition filed against provisions enforced by Division Bench in Komalan can succeed after SC's interim order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUNEESH AND OTHERS
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court