M.Selvaraj v. K.S.E.B
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged orders directing his reversion on account of a stayed appointment scheme. Court held no warrant for reversion where status quo continued and quashed impugned orders.
What did the court decide?
Exts. P3 and P4 quashed; liberty granted to Board to take further action pursuant to Ext. P1 as permissible in law.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
THURSDAY, THE 15TH OCTOBER 2009 / 23RD ASWINA 1931
WP(C).No. 14008 of 2009(U)
--------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
M.SELVARAJ, SUB ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) TRAINEE, ELECTRICAL SECTION, K.S.E.BOARD, BIG BAZAR, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order directing the reversion of a cadre employee initiated due to a stayed scheme warrants quashing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. SELVARAJ
- respondent
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
- respondent
THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), K.E.B.
- respondent
THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE
- respondent
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court