Allowed

S.Chandrasekhara Pillai v. K.S.R.T.C.

Kerala HC4 Jun 2009WP(C)/10610/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petition, directing the respondent corporation to release the due CVP and DCRG amounts to a retired employee within 45 days. The court treated the marriage as a sufficient cause for out-of-turn payment from the 10% earmarked collection.

What did the court decide?

The Respondent Corporation is directed to release the amount due to the Petitioner in terms of CVP and DCRG within 45 days.

S.Chandrasekhara Pillai Vs K.S.R.T.C. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2009 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1931

¶4

WP(C).No. 10610 of 2009(U)

¶5

---------------------------------------

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

----------------------

¶8

S. CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI, S/O.SIVASANKARA PILLAI, T.K.HOUSE, PERINGAMMALA P.O., PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, (CONDUCTOR-RETIRED, K.S.R.T.C., PALODE-NEDUMANGAD).

¶9

BY ADV. MR.ANANDARAJAN.N

¶10

MR.C.V.MILTON

¶11

RESPONDENT(S):

¶12

-------------------------

¶13

1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23.

¶14

2. THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23.

¶15

3. THE ASSISTANT PERSONAL OFFICER (PENSION), KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23.

¶16

4. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C. NEDUMANGAD.

¶17

R1 TO R4 BY ADV. MR.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, KSRTC

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

Rs/

¶20

THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, J

¶21

........................................... WP(C).NO. 10610 OF 2009 ............................................

¶22

DATED THIS THE 4^th DAY OF JUNE, 2009

¶23

JUDGMENT

¶24

The petitioner retired from the service of the first respondent, KSRTC on 30.4.2007, after serving it as a Conductor. On the ground that his daughter's marriage is fixed to be solemnized on 16.5.2009, the petitioner filed this writ petition seeking a direction for out of turn release of CVP and DCRG. During the pendency of this writ petition, the marriage has been solemnized. I am satisfied that the petitioner has shown sufficient cause for being treated as eligible for out of turn payment of DCRG and CVP as a special case in terms of the directions of the Division Bench of this court and Apex Court, from out of the 10% of the collections earmarked in the Treasury for release of such amounts. Let the amount due to the petitioner in terms of this judgment be released within a period of 45 days from today.

¶25

THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE

¶26

lgk/4/6

S.Chandrasekhara Pillai v. K.S.R.T.C.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Chandrasekhara Pillai v. K.S.R.T.C.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Mooppan Motos (P) Ltd. Vs the Principal Secretary to Govt.

Tintumon & Another Vs the State of Kerala & Others

Assis Syed Muhammed Vs Dy.Director of Panchayats, Thodupuzha

M.P.Abraham Vs the Managing Director

Rahiyanath Azad Vs the State of Kerala

Khadeeja Madambillath Vs Ombudsman for Local Self Govt.