The High Court of Kerala granted the petitioner permission to withdraw the transfer petition reserving her right to move afresh. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with reservation to move afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1931
Tr.P(C).No. 285 of 2009 ------------------------OP.597/2009 of FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA
PETITIONER:
SULFIYA BEEVI,AGED 48 YEARS, W/O. GAFOOR KHAN, NIRAPPUVILA VEETTIL, ALAYAMON VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KARAKON, PATHARAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. MR.JOHNSON GOMEZ
RESPONDENTS:
ADV. MR.V.K.SUNIL FOR R1 & R2
THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Tr.P(C).No. 285 of 2009
ORDER ON I.A.NO.2924/2009 IN TR.P.C.NO.285/2009
DISMISSED.
17/11/2009
SD/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE.
// TRUE COPY //
P.A TO JUDGE.
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.
Tr.P.C.No.285 of 2009
Dated this the 17th day of November, 2009
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the transfer petition reserving his right to move afresh, if found necessary, after filing a petition before the Family Court, Thiruvalla, on the question of maintainability of O.P.No.597 of 2009 on its file, and passing of orders on such petition.
Permission granted, and the transfer petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE.
bkn/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission to withdraw the transfer petition with reservation to move afresh should be granted.
Sulfiya Beevi
Reena Mujeeb
Gafoor Khan
S.S.Satheesachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
