K.S.R.T.C v. D.Madhusoodanan Nair
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petitioner KSRTC failed to press its review petition in a writ appeal regarding retirement benefits; dismissed as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
The review petition is dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2009 / 29TH ASWINA 1931
RP.No. 648 of 2009(P) --------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.3502/2009 ....................
REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENT IN WPC
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN,FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC
RESPONDENT(S):
D.MADHUSOODANAN NAIR,(VEHICLE SUPERVISOR, KSRTC VELLANDU DEPOT, RTD. ON 30/09/06,THUSHARAM, VEMBANOOR, ARUVIKKARA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kerala State Road Transport Corporation
- respondent
D. Madhusoodanana Nair
Coram
S. SIRI JAGAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court