M.a.Malika v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition dismissed. Court held no error on facts warranted review; contemporaneous admissions and appellate findings confirmed non-disputed occupation by respondents since 1960.
What did the court decide?
There is no relief.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 16TH BHADRA 1931
RP.No. 572 of 2004()
-------------------AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRP.2370/1996 Dated 20/01/2004 (AA 90/95 OF THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY(LAND REFORMS), THRISSUR) (OA.8/1986 OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM)
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN CRP:
M.A.MALIKA, D/O. ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI, MOOTHEDATHU, ELAMKULAM, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM
SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER, SENIOR ADVOCATE
SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN SRI.P.T.GIRIJAN SRI.PRAMODH.R SMT.USHA NARAYANAN
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an admission regarding residence in the impugned building recorded in the revision order was incorrect and warranting a review.
Whether the grounds canvassed in the review petition adequately challenged the specific observation alleged to be erroneous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.A. Malika
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
T.K. Vishwanathan Pillai
- respondent
Saraswathy Ammal
- respondent
Gopalakrishnan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court