Joseph Raj Jestus v. Nirmala Simson etc.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court granted the petitioner-cum-defendant leave to withdraw the criminal revision petition with liberty to challenge the compromise decree passed in the underlying civil suit by initiating appropriate legal proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Application to withdraw revision with liberty to challenge compromise decree by appropriate proceedings allowed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 16TH BHADRA 1931
CRP.No. 214 of 2009()
--------------------AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05/03/2009 IN IA 5502/2006 AND IA 5503/2006 IN OS.766/2001 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM
REVN. PETITIONER/PETITIONER/1ST DEFENDANT:
JOSEPH RAJ JESTUS, S/O.JESTUS, GRATIAS BHAVAN, MAYYANAD CHERRY, MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.N.SUKUMARAN
SRI.S.SHYAM
RESPONDENTS/COUNTER PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Joseph Raj Jestus
- respondent
Nirmala Simson
- respondent
Simson Victor
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court