This is a review petition against a judgment dismissing a writ petition. The single judge recalled the earlier judgment, allowed the review petition, and directed the writ petition to be heard afresh, specifying conclusion to hold.
The review petition is allowed; the judgment dated 6-11-2008 is recalled; the writ petition is posted for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930
RP.No. 51 of 2009(B)
-------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.11989/2008
REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS IN WPC
BY ADV. SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, K.S.R.T.C.
RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER IN WPC
N.S.CHANDRAMOHANAN, SRUTHI, CHIRATTAKONAM, THALACHIRA P.O. KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
S. Siri Jagan, J.
in
In view of Annexure A, I am of opinion that the writ petition has to be heard afresh. Accordingly, the judgment dated 6-11-2008 is recalled and the writ petition is posted for hearing.
The review petition is allowed as above.
Tds/
[True copy]
P.S to Judge.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition should be allowed to re-hear the writ petition.
N.S.CHANDRAMOHANAN, SRUTHI
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
S. SIRI JAGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
