Meena Vasanth v. Asst.Commissioner (Assessment)
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge allowed the Review Petition and disposed of the underlying Writ Petition by modifying the judgment to leave Prayer No.4 open, consistent with the earlier decision regarding Prayer No.3.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 9TH JANUARY 2009 / 19TH POUSHA 1930
RP.No. 1398 of 2008(I)
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.29908/2008 Dated 22/10/2008
REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
MEENA VASANTH
W/O.LATE B.RAMANUJAN THAMPI, VASANTH VIHAR KOCHUPILAMOOD, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON
SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Review Petition challenging the omission to leave Prayer No.4 open in the Writ Petition should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MEENA VASANTH
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
K.M.JOSEPH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court