V.V. Jayaram v. Suguthan
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court allowed revision to countermand an order against a judgment debtor in execution proceedings. The Court found the petitioner was avoiding debt discharge and flouting court orders, directing immediate enforcement.
What did the court decide?
Ordered immediate steps for execution of the warrant and appropriate proceedings for breach of undertaking; directed police to assist in arrest and production.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1931
CRP.No. 559 of 2009()
---------------------
OS.152/1996 of SUB COURT, CHERTHALA
REVN. PETITIONER(S)/JUDGMENT DEBTOR/PETITIONER:
-----------------------------------------------
V.V.JAYARAM, RESIDING AT SEETHA BHAVAN, MADACKAL, CHERTHALA.
BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL JACOB JOSE
RESPONDENT(S)/DECREE HOLDER/COUNTER PETITIONER:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the lower court to enforce an execution warrant against a debtor who has repeatedly failed to comply with court undertakings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.V.Jayaram
- respondent
Sugathan K.Panicker
Coram
S.S.Satheesachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court