M.Satheesh Kumar v. Smt.P.R.Anitha
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
FRIDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2009 / 23RD SRAVANA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 629 of 2009(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT WPC.21062/2007 Dated 02/03/2009 ....................
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------
M.SATHEESH KUMAR,AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVAN NAIR,DEPUTY DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD.
BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL
RESPONDENT: 1ST RESPONDENT --------------
SMT.P.R.ANITHA,AGED NOT KNOWN, D/O.NOT KNOWN,SECRETARY,TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,NANTHANCODE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN, SC, TDB
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
C.O.C.No.629/2009
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 14th day of August, 2009
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directions
issued by this Court in Annexure-I judgment have been fully complied with including payment of salary. It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent also that all the reliefs directed to be given to the petitioner in Annexure-I judgment have been duly granted. In that view of the matter, Contempt of Court Case is closed.
(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)
ms
M. SATHyESH KUMAR
P.R. ANITHA
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court