Smt.P.Thankamony v. T.P.Senkumar, IPS
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed this contempt case after the respondent corporation submitted that the prior direction in Annexure I was complied with, though the petitioner reserved rights to claim further amounts.
What did the court decide?
This contempt case is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
SATURDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2009 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1931
Con.Case(C).No. 356 of 2009(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.13524/2006
PETITIONER(S): ADDL. PETITIONER IN W.P.(C)
SMT. P.THANKAMONY, W/O. LATE
K.KARUNAKARAN,AGED 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOVILAKOM VILAVILAKAM HOUSE, NRA-57,V.VNAGAR,NCCROAD, PEROORKADA, HTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
- SHRI.T.P. SENKUMAR, IPS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC,TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. P. Thankamony
- respondent
Shri. T.P. Senkumar
- respondent
Shri. Rajasekharan Nair
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court