M.M.Sulaiman Rawther v. Mr.Rajasekharan Pillai
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed the withdrawal of a contempt case by mutual agreement of parties as the boundary lines of the petitioner's property were established, rendering further orders unnecessary. The case was closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Case closed as boundaries drawn; no further orders necessary.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
TUESDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 28TH MAGHA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 1878 of 2008(S)
-------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.11389/2008 Dated 03/04/2008
PETITIONER/ PETITIONER:
M.M.SULAIMAN RAWTHER, AGED 72, S/O. MEERAPILLAI RAWTHER, KURICHIMUTTOM P.O, VALLANA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY MR.R.VINOD, ADVOCATE.
RESPONDENT/ 2ND RESPONDENT:
MR.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI, AGED NOT KNOWN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, ARANMULA.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.M.SULAIMAN RAWTHER
- respondent
MR.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI
Coram
S.SIRI JAGAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court