D.N.Renjith v. C.K.Viswanathan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case, the Court closed proceedings after the respondent satisfied it via affidavit that further pursuit was unnecessary, allowing petitioners to seek other remedies for post reservation assurances.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
THURSDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 16TH MAGHA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 1729 of 2008(S) ------------------------------IN WPC.36784/2007 OF THIS COURT ....................
PETITIONER(S):
- D.N.RENJITH, AGED 33, S/O. N. DHANAPALAN NIRMALA NIKTH, KONNIMELCHERY, KAVANADU P.O., KOLLAM WORKING AS PEON, E.S.I. DISPENSARY, PARIPPALLY, KOLLAM.
- S.V. BIJU, AGED 30, S/O. SUKUMARAN NAIR, SINDHU NIVAS, AKODE, KAVUSSERY P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST.
BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI
RESPONDENT(S):
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be kept in custody for contempt of court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.N.RENJITH
- petitioner
S.V. BIJU
- respondent
C.K. VISWANATHAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court