Varghese @ Kunjumon v. P.P.Joy
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged non-compliance of a prior direction to act on Exhibit P5. The court found that the respondent had issued a communication in pursuance of the direction as directed by the judgment dated 21/06/2008. Consequently, the court closed the contempt proceedings.
What did the court decide?
The contempt proceedings were closed due to compliance with earlier directions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2009 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 108 of 2009(S)
-------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16861/2008 Dated 06/06/2008
PETITIONERS :
VARGHESE @ KUNJUMON, S/O.KURIAKOSE, ARACKAL HOUSE, MAIKKADU VILLAGE, ANGAMALY, NEDUMBASSERY.
BY ADV. SRI.RAJEEV.K.S.
RESPONDENTS//RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2:
- GEORGE EAPEN, AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WAS WORKING AS SECRETARY TO NEDUMBASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, AND NOW WORKING AS SECRETARY, KODAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contemning party has complied with the direction to take action on Exhibit P5.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VARGHESE @ KUNJUMON
- respondent
GEORGE EAPEN
- respondent
P.P.JOY
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court