Sajith Lal v. a.Krishna Prasad
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case challenging the non-compliance with a direction to consider representations, the Court found that the respondents had considered the representations and passed an order dated 17/08/09. The Court held that no further proceedings were necessary.
What did the court decide?
Contempt is closed; petitioners left to pursue grievances against the order passed on 17/8/09.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 24TH BHADRA 1931
Con.Case(C).No. 1007 of 2009(S)
-------------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.17226/2009 Dated 22/06/2009
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:
-------------------------------------
1. SAJITH LAL, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. ARUMUGHAN, PEON, TANUR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED, NON.M.510, KUTTIPPILAN PLAZA NEAR BUS STAND, P.O.TANUR, PIN-676302.
2. RAKESH.K.S., AGED 32 YEARS S/O. SIVADASA MARAR, NIGHT WATCHMAN, TANUR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED, NO.M.510, KUTTIPPILAN PLAZA NEAR BUS STAND P.O. TNUR, PIN-676302.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to proceed with contempt proceedings given that the directed representation has been considered and order passed.
Whether the short delay in compliance warrants proceeding with the contempt petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAJITH LAL
- petitioner
RAKESH.K.S.
- respondent
A. KRISHNA PRASAD
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court