Rupina Crasta Vs State of Kerala

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused in Cr. No. 4 of 2009 of Kasaragode Excise Range for an offence punishable under Sec. 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 5 litres of arrack seeks anticipatory Bail.

¶21

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶22

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case involving such grave offence. It is too early to accept the petitioner's contention that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, If the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned within two weeks from today and files an application for regular bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed bearing in mind the decision in Sukumari v. State of Kerala - 2001 (1) KLT 22.

¶23

With the above observation this Application is disposed of .

¶24

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶25

ani

¶26

B.A.No. 2

Rupina Crasta v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupina Crasta v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Biju and Others Vs State of Kerala

Mahroof Ali and Another Vs the Sho, Mavoor Police Station

Usha Vs State of Kerala

K.L.Muhammed Vs State of Kerala and Another

Kurian Kurian Vs State of Kerala

L.Ivy Vs State of Kerala and Others