Disposed

L.Ivy v. State of Kerala and Others

Kerala HC16 Mar 2009Bail Appl./1055/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a 2nd accused, sought anticipatory bail. The court held anticipatory bail inappropriate but permitted surrender for interrogation to facilitate subsequent regular bail proceedings before the Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender between 20-3-2009 and 23-3-2009 for interrogation and subsequent production before the Magistrate for regular bail.

L.Ivy Vs State of Kerala and Others — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

MONDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2009 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 1055 of 2009() ----------------------------CRIME NO. 73 OF 2009 OF VALIYATHURA POLICE STATION

¶5

PETITIONER

¶6

¶7

L.IVY, AGED 5O YRS, W/O.NELSON, PROPRIETRIX OF MATHA TRAVELS KILKOLLUR KOLLAM AND RESIDING AT I.S.NIVAS,MANGADU.PO, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

¶11

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CRIME DETACHMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY.

¶12

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,VALIYATHURA POLICE STATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶13

STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶14

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. SRI.K.S. SIVAKUMAR

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶17

- - - - Dated: 16^th day of March, 2009

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Petitioner who is the 2^nd accused in Crime No. 74 of 2009 of Valiyathura Police Station for correction of date of birth in a passport, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶20

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

¶21

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have her application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on any day between 20-3-2009 and 23-3-2009 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced on the same day before the Magistrate who shall consider and dispose of her application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶22

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶23

Dated this the 16^th day of March 2009.

¶24

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶25

ani

¶26

V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE)

¶27

ani

¶28

ani.

L.Ivy v. State of Kerala and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L.Ivy v. State of Kerala and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Biju and Others Vs State of Kerala

Mahroof Ali and Another Vs the Sho, Mavoor Police Station

Usha Vs State of Kerala

Rupina Crasta Vs State of Kerala

K.L.Muhammed Vs State of Kerala and Another

Kurian Kurian Vs State of Kerala