Allowed

Sajithkumar.T. v. Sub Inspector of Police Kottayam and Anr.

Kerala HC20 Aug 2009Bail Appl./3756/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC to the petitioner, who faced charges of assaulting a public servant and criminal intimidation. Bail was granted subject to reporting to the investigating officer and other standard conditions, without involving security money given the nature of the offence and facts.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed subject to conditions of reporting to the investigating officer between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on alternate Mondays and not tampering with evidence or committing offences.

Sajithkumar.T. Vs Sub Inspector of Police Kottayam and Anr. — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2009)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2009 / 29TH SRAVANA 1931

¶4

Bail Appl..No. 3756 of 2009() ----------------------------CRIME NO.103/2009 OF KADUTHURUTHY POLICE STATION

¶5

PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶6

¶7

SAJITHKUMAR.T, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.LATE THOMAS, PARATHANAL, NAZRETH HILL P.O., KOTTAYAM.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW ABRAHAM

¶9

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT

¶10

¶11

SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADUTHURUTHY, KOTTAYAM.

¶12

CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADUTHURUTHY, KOTTAYAM REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶13

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JIKKU JACOB

¶14

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

K.T.SANKARAN, J.

¶16

B.A.No.3756 of 2009

¶17

Dated this the 20^th day of August, 2009

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.103 of 2009 of Kaduthuruthy Police Station.

¶20

The offences alleged against the petitioner are under

¶21

Sections 452, 323 and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶22

I have gone through the case diary.

¶23

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

¶24

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner.

¶25

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the petitioner, the officer in charge of the police station shall release him on bail on his executing bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶26

a) The petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on every alternate Monday, till the final report is filed or until further orders;

¶27

BA No.3756/2009

¶28

¶29

b) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required;

¶30

c) The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

¶31

d) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail;

¶32

e) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶33

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

¶34

above.

¶35

K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE

¶36

csl

Sajithkumar.T. v. Sub Inspector of Police Kottayam and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajithkumar.T. v. Sub Inspector of Police Kottayam and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Das Vs State of Kerala

Raju Mestri @ Jose Vs State of Kerala

R.Rajesh Vs Sub Inspector of Police

S.v.Anilkumar Vs State of Kerala

Muraleedharan K.R. & Others Vs State of Kerala

Abdulla @ Abdulla Kunhi Vs Sub Inspector of Police